The Attorney General Guidelines also mandate that sensitive criminal investigations be brought to the attention of the U.S. Attorney and authorizes the FBI to conduct intelligence investigations for the purposes of identifying criminal enterprises and their capacity to do harm, e.g.
These Guidelines are issued under the authority of the Attorney General as provided in 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, and 533. II. General Crimes Investigations
Maintaining the attorney-client privilege in an in-house counsel-led internal investigation is not automatic, and can be tricky. Investigations conducted or directed by in-house counsel increase the risk that the company’s attorney-client privilege and work product protections will be waived.
For more information, please contact Tom Jones , David Kelch or any member of Porter Wright's Corporate & Internal Investigations Practice Group. [1] Making an investigative report to the government regarding the investigation’s findings may result in a waiver of the privilege and work product protection.
AGs investigate and bring actions under their states' respective unfair, deceptive, and abusive practices laws (“UDAP laws”). UDAP laws tend to broadly prohibit “deceptive” or “unconscionable” acts against consumers.
OPR also investigates certain misconduct allegations involving federal law enforcement agents when they relate to a Department attorney's alleged professional misconduct, as well as claims of reprisal against FBI whistleblowers.
The main responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General are defending the State of Texas and its duly elected laws by providing legal representation to the State, serving the children of Texas through the enforcement of the state's child support laws, securing justice for Texans, protecting Texans from waste, ...
United StatesFederal Bureau of Investigation / JurisdictionFederal law gives the FBI authority to investigate all federal crime not assigned exclusively to another federal agency (28, Section 533 of the U.S. Code). Title 28, U.S. Code, Section 533, authorizes the attorney general to appoint officials to detect and prosecute crimes against the United States.
Within the U.S. Department of Justice, the FBI is responsible to the attorney general, and it reports its findings to U.S. Attorneys across the country. The FBI's intelligence activities are overseen by the Director of National Intelligence.
The National Security Agency (NSA) is a national-level intelligence agency of the United States Department of Defense, under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI)....National Security Agency.Agency overviewAnnual budgetClassified (estimated $10.8 billion, 2013)11 more rows
The Attorney-General is the Chief Law officer of a state responsible for advising the government on legal matters and representing it in litigation.
Who is Attorney General of India? Article 76 of the constitution mentions that he/she is the highest law officer of India. As a chief legal advisor to the government of India, he advises the union government on all legal matters. He also is the primary lawyer representing Union Government in the Supreme Court of India.
POWERS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FEDERATION TO ENGAGE COUNSEL The constitutional power vested on the AGF under Section 174 of the 1999 CFRN (as amended) is in respect of prosecution of criminal matters without any express provisions in respect of civil matters.
the directorTip. The highest rank in the FBI is the director. The office is filled by presidential appointment, provided the Senate votes to confirm. The FBI director answers to the U.S. attorney general, the director of national intelligence and various congressional committees.
ContentsDirector's Office.National Security Branch.Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch.Intelligence Branch.Science and Technology Branch.Information and Technology Branch.Human Resources Branch.
The FBI Police is the uniformed security police of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and is part of the Bureau's Security Division....FBI PoliceAgencyFederal Bureau of InvestigationTypeSecurity policePart ofSecurity DivisionMotto"Protecting those who protect America!"8 more rows
The standards and requirements set forth herein govern the circumstances under which an investigation may be begun, and the permissible scope, duration, subject-matters, and objectives of an investigation. All investigations of crime or crime-related activities shall be undertaken in accordance with one or more of these Guidelines.
In determining whether an investigation should be conducted, the FBI shall consider all of the circumstances including: (1) the magnitude of the threatened harm; (2) the likelihood it will occur; (3) the immediacy of the threat; and (4) the danger to privacy and free expression posed by an investigation. b.
b. A racketeering enterprise investigation may be initially authorized for a period of up to 180 days.
As the primary criminal investigative agency in the federal government, the FBI has the authority and responsibility to investigate all criminal violations of federal law not exclusively assigned to another federal agency.
b. A domestic security/terrorism investigation may be initially authorized for a period of up to 180 days.
If, on the basis of information discovered in the course of a preliminary inquiry, an investigation is warranted, it may be conducted as a general crimes investigation, or a criminal intelligence investigation, or both.
In determining whether there is reasonable indication of a federal criminal violation, a Special Agent may take into account any facts or circumstances that a prudent investigator would consider. However, the standard does require specific facts or circumstances indicating a past, current, or impending violation.
Attorney General Ken Paxton’s position is clear that the governor’s orders and state law apply to all Texans and protect their right to make
We regularly identify unique threats to Texas—and we take action to defeat them.
Ken Paxton is the 51st Attorney General of Texas. He was elected on November 4, 2014, and sworn into office on January 5, 2015.
State Attorneys General. State attorneys general are unique constitutional officers in the U.S. legal and political landscape. With sweeping powers to launch investigations and bring actions on behalf of states or consumers, state attorneys general can have a profound impact on corporations, foundations, individuals and investors.
a large refiner of petroleum products in price manipulation investigations by state attorneys general from Texas, Florida, California, Missouri, Arizona and Kentucky, as well as the Federal Trade Commission. food, dietary supplement and over-the-counter drug companies in cases brought against them by the California Attorney General’s Office.
In-house counsel should draft an investigation privilege memo to personnel that will be involved in the investigation. The memo should explain the contours of the privilege and work product doctrine and train team members on how to preserve them.
To protect the privilege, the corporate client has the burden of showing that the in-house counsel’s communication (1) was between an attorney and his client, (2) was made for the purpose of providing legal advice to the corporation and (3) that the communication was intended to be, and was in fact, kept confidential. See, e.g., Pritchard v.
Interview notes are likely discoverable because facts are not privileged.
While it may become advantageous to later waive the privilege in part or whole, if the privilege is not established and preserved at the outset, there will be no decision to be made as the matter progresses.
Counsel alone should conduct interviews where possible. If not possible, then make privilege more likely by having counsel direct the interviews, review the interview notes and summarize, and provide interview outline or topics for questioning. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., “agents of attorneys in internal investigations are routinely protected by the attorney-client privilege.”
In-house counsel frequently perform both a business and a legal function for the company. But, only in-house counsel’s communications in their legal role can be privileged. An in-house counsel’s communications relating to his or her business function are not privileged simply because the in-house counsel is an attorney.
The attorney-client privilege has long been held to apply in the corporate context. But, its contours are not clear, and whether the privilege protects an in-house counsel’s communications is determined on a case-by-case basis. To protect the privilege, the corporate client has the burden of showing that the in-house counsel’s communication (1) ...