Answer: Dudly and Stephen’s murder was unecceptable, and I have no arguments. What they had done was selfish, and not even nessecary.
Brief Fact Summary. ' Dudley and Stephens (defendants) murdered a fellow young seaman (Parker) in order to save their own lives from starvation. They were found guilty of murder. ... Four days later a vessel rescued them and Dudley and Stephens were charged with murder.
On their return to England Dudley & Stephens were charged with the boy's murder. ... The defendants were convicted of murder. The defence of necessity was not allowed. They were sentenced to death but then granted a pardon by the Crown and served 6 months imprisonment.
You can not equate the two. Just because something is immoral does not make it illegal and just because something is illegal it does not make it immoral. Not all immoral acts are illegal. Some immoral acts are legally permissible.
THE SHIPWRECKED SAILORS. Three sailors on an ocean-going freighter were cast adrift in a life raft after their ship sank during a storm in the Atlantic Ocean. The ship went down so suddenly that there was no time to send out an S.O.S. As far as the three sailors knew, they were the only survivors.
As an attorney for Dudley and Stephens, what arguments would you make on their behalf? I would argue that Brooks had agreed to draw lots and the loser would be killed and eaten by the other two. I would also argue that without doing so, Dudley and Stephens would have also died of starvation.
On July 29th they were rescued. At the trial, both Dudley and Stephens were convicted of murder and sentenced to death. But the sentence was commuted to six months in prison. This case set a precedent that cannibalism was both illegal, and that necessity for survival doesn't excuse murder.Jun 25, 2018
What is morally right but ethically wrong? Persecution on religious grounds is one of the most common examples of something that is morally right (or at least morally excusable) but ethically wrong.Dec 21, 2021
Example 2: If you took a child away from it's home because they were being abused or something yes it would be morally right to do so but if you have no proof then it is illegal and you are charged for kidnapping. It absolutely can be morally right to do something but unlawful.Sep 21, 2017
Morally wrong acts are activities such as murder, theft, rape, lying, and breaking promises. Other descriptions would be that they are morally prohibited, morally impermissible, acts one ought not to do, and acts one has a duty to refrain from doing. Morally right acts are activities that are allowed.
Defendant. What would the persons bringing the case ask for? Money.
It happened when a small yacht being sailed to Australia by an experienced English seafarer, Tom Dudley, and his mates Edwin Stephens, Edmund Brooks and the 17-year old cabin boy, Richard Thomas Parker. But the boat, called the Mignonette, sunk with little warning on the high seas on July 5, 1884.
After 8 days, little Parker passed out and Captain Tom Dudley proposed they eat the lad. So they slit his throat and ate him for 4 days until they were rescued. Apparently, they almost got away with the crime because the tradition of the sea was to eat cabin boys in a pinch.Mar 13, 2007