as an attorney for dudley and stephens what arguments would you make on their behalf

by Amanda Muller 3 min read

As an attorney for Dudley and Stephens, what arguments would you make on their behalf? I would argue that Brooks had agreed to draw lots and the loser would be killed and eaten by the other two. I would also argue that without doing so, Dudley and Stephens would have also died of starvation.

What was the primary question moral argument in the case of the Queen v Dudley and Stephens?

Regina v Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273 DC is a leading English criminal case which established a precedent throughout the common law world that necessity is not a defence to a charge of murder.

What is the issue in Dudley & Stephens?

' Dudley and Stephens (defendants) murdered a fellow young seaman (Parker) in order to save their own lives from starvation. They were found guilty of murder. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Killing an innocent life to save one's own does not justify murder even if it under extreme necessity of hunger.

What would the person bringing the case ask for?

Defendant. What would the persons bringing the case ask for? Money.

What was the legal issue concerning the shipwrecked sailors?

They explained to authorities what had happened to Brooks. After recovering from their ordeal, the two were placed on trial for murder. The country in which they were tried had the following law: Any person who deliberately takes the life of another is guilty of murder.

What is the significance of Regina v Dudley and Stephens to criminal law jurisprudence?

ruling on necessity doctrine The leading English case, Regina v. Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 Q.B.D. 273, appears to reject the necessity defense in homicide cases. In German or French courts, however, the defendants would probably have been acquitted.

What was the outcome in the case of the Queen v Dudley and Stephens 1884 )?

On July 29th they were rescued. At the trial, both Dudley and Stephens were convicted of murder and sentenced to death. But the sentence was commuted to six months in prison. This case set a precedent that cannibalism was both illegal, and that necessity for survival doesn't excuse murder.Jun 25, 2018

Why would a good lawyer not tell a client how their case will come out at the initial consultation?

Why would a good lawyer not tell a client how their case will come out at the initial consultation? A good lawyer knows that every case is different and without doing research. A good lawyer will not guarantee the outcome of any case.

What are the four types of legal wrongs in civil law?

In civil law, there are four broad types of wrongdoings that can be prosecuted: tort, contract, warranty, or family matters.

How do you win a lawsuit?

With this in mind, here are some tips on how to win a court case.Don't Litigate for Spite or Revenge. Definitely don't make your litigation decisions for vindictive reasons. ... Seek Mediation Instead of Litigation. ... Be the Master of Your Case. ... Listen to Your Advisers. ... Be Flexible.Apr 9, 2019

What purpose would be served by convicting Dudley and Stephens?

d) What purpose would be served by convicting Dudley and Stephens? It would serve the purpose of enforcing the law in that country which is “any person who deliberately takes the life of another is guilty of murder.” Also, it would give justice and closure to Brooks' family and friends.