applying the rules of evidence what every attorney needs to know june 23, 2016

by Prof. Guillermo Keebler I 3 min read

What are the rules of evidence in federal court?

Jul 26, 2016 · The process for providing a copy of the exhibit to the judge may differ depending on whether your trial is civil, criminal or family, etc. Many judges have personal preferences and different expectations when it comes to this issue. You need to know what those are. STEP 4: Develop a factual basis for admitting your exhibit into evidence.

How should I study the law of evidence?

Jul 27, 2018 · Evidence must be relevant in order for it to be admissible in court. Rule 401 states that evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.

When is evidence relevant to a case?

Mar 29, 2018 · Rules Evid. 614. When part of an act, declaration, conversation, or writing is given in evidence by one party, such other parts of the act, declaration, conversation, or writing, as are necessary in fairness to a complete understanding of the parts admitted will also be admitted. Evid. Code § 356; Fed.

What is the modern trend in the law of evidence?

Bruer Law Firm Lawrence Kansas City Injury and Tort Lawyers (785) 371-1445 LAWRENCE (816) 912-0030 KANSAS CITY PHONE ⌻ TEXT ⌻ ⍰ EMAIL ⍰ Presentations and Materials - Bruer Law Firm - Kansas and Missouri (Click on any of the presentation titles to download the materials.) ˙ Overview of Missouri Premises Liability Law - June 25, 2008

image

When are the rules of evidence amended?

The Federal Rules of Evidence are amended each year – usually in March, with the amendments taking effect in December of the same year. Additionally, many states (including California) have adopted their own evidence codes aligning with the federal rules. If your business is involved in a lawsuit, hiring a business attorney will ensure you are able to present all of the evidence allowed under the rules.

How many rules of evidence are there?

There are 67 rules in total – not as lengthy as many court documents, but certainly no quick or easy read, either. It is not necessary for business leaders to know the rules inside and out; that's the job of San Diego business attorneys like Gehres Law Group, P.C. However, it is advantageous to understand the basics and a few of the nuances in the event a lawsuit is brought against your company.

What are the types of evidence?

There are four types of evidence that can be presented in federal court: 1 Real evidence 2 Demonstrative evidence 3 Documentary evidence 4 Testimonial evidence

Why is Rule 801 referenced?

Rule 801 is referenced because it governs the hearsay rule. One of the most notable obstacles for both parties in a trial, hearsay is defined in Rule 801 as a statement that:

What is the best evidence rule?

Code §§ 1500, 1508. The best evidence rule arose during the days when a copy was usually made by a clerk or, worse, a party to the lawsuit. Courts generally assumed that, if the original was not produced, there was a good chance of either a scrivener's error or fraud.

What are witnesses required to give?

Witnesses are required to give their answers in the form of statements of what they saw, heard, felt, tasted, or smelled. They are generally forbidden to express opinions or draw conclusions. As anyone who gives the matter any thought soon discovers, this distinction between fact and opinion is not always clear. In addition, many witnesses find it impossible to give their testimony in the required form, and certain perceptions are very difficult to communicate without using language that suggests judgments and opinions. Osborn v. Mission Ready Mix (1990) 224 Cal. App.3rd 104, 112-113; 273 Cal Rptr. 457, 461-462. As a result, both California law and the federal rules have substantially relaxed the rule against lay opinions to facilitate the reception of evidence.

What are the four types of evidence?

THE FOUR TYPES OF EVIDENCE. There are four traditional types of evidence: real, demonstrative, documentary, and testimonial. Some rules of evidence apply to all four types and some apply only to some or one of them. First, we will cover general rules of admissibility that apply to all evidence.

What are the prerequisites for admissibility?

The basic prerequisites of admissibility are relevance, materiality, and competence. In general, if evidence is shown to be relevant, material, and competent, and is not barred by an exclusionary rule, it is admissible. Evid. Code § 351; Fed. Rules Evid. 402.

Is evidence prejudicial?

The fact that evidence may be extremely harmful to one party's case does not necessarily make it prejudicial. Courts also have discretion to exclude otherwise admissible evidence to prevent confusion, delay, waste of time, or the needless presentation of cumulative evidence. Evid. Code § 352; Fed.

What is the meaning of 355?

However, where the value of evidence for its proper purpose is slight and the likelihood that it will be used for an improper purpose by a finder of fact is great , a court may, in its discretion, exclude the evidence even though it would otherwise be admissible. Evid. Code § 352; Fed. Rules Evid. 403.

Can you ask leading questions on a direct examination?

On direct examination, you are generally not permitted to ask leading questions. Fed. Rules Evid. 611 (c). Direct examination is questioning by the lawyer who calls the witness to testify concerning matters that into which he is the first party to inquire. Evid. Code § 760. A leading question is one that suggests an answer or substitutes the words of the lawyer for those of the witness. These are questions like "You told the defendant that you were relying on him for advice, didn't you?"

When is evidence used in a trial?

Evidence is used at the summary judgment and trial stages of a case. Evidence can be used for a limited purpose. A jury can be instructed to only use evidence to help determine a single fact and not draw inferences to other facts, for example. A jury can also be instructed to apply evidence to only one party to a case in certain circumstances.

What is relevant evidence?

Relevant Evidence. For evidence to be relevant, there must be some logical connection, even if just a tenuous one, to the evidence and the fact trying to be proved. An item of evidence can be admissible even if it does not prove or disprove something on its own. As the Federal Rules of Evidence puts it, evidence is relevant if:

What is the outcome of a case?

The outcome of a case often depends on what evidence is admissible. While rules of evidence and case law provide guidance on admissible evidence, attorneys know that judges have wide discretion in allowing evidence. A well-timed objection can throw a wrench in the opposing party's case or get a jury on your side.

What are the different types of evidence?

Types of Evidence. There are four general types of evidence: Real (or tangible) evidence is directly involved in the case, such as the gun involved in the murder. Demonstrative evidence helps to clarify or assist in witness testimony. A map showing the scene of the accident is an example of this.

Is documentary evidence real?

Documentary evidence can also be a type of real evidence, such as a contract. This includes electronic and digital evidence, as well. Testimonial evidence is what a competent witness says in court. Each type of evidence has its own rules for establishing relevance and being authenticated, two requirements for admissibility.

Is evidence of character admissible?

Character Evidence. Typically, evidence of someone's character is not admissible to prove that a person acted in accordance with their character or trait. In other words, evidence that a person stole before is not admissible to prove that they stole this time. This is true whether a person's character is relevant or not.

What is the purpose of authenticating evidence?

In addition to being relevant, admissible evidence must be authenticated. To authenticate evidence is to show that the evidence is what it is supposed to be. Attorneys can authenticate evidence through:

How long does a prescriptive easement last?

As a result, a prescriptive easement must meet the requirements of open, adverse, and notorious use for ten (10) years.

What is a north arrow?

A north arrow (with north to the top of the drawing when practicable), a legend of symbols and abbreviations, and a vicinity map showing the property in reference to nearby highway(s) or major street intersection(s). ii. Supplementary or detail diagrams when necessary.

What is a known point?

The description must begin with one of the following: (1) a known point (a monument such as a street, a man-made monument or marker, or a natural object such as ^a stone wall); (2) a certain course and distance . WHAT EVERY ATTORNEY NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT SURVEY MAPS PAGE 13 OF 42 . from a monument.

Who is Chris Eagan?

Chris is a Partner of the firm. He has served as Chairman of the firm’s Recruiting Committee, and has served on the firm’s Executive Committee.

How many kids does Chris have?

Fun Facts. Chris is married to a trial lawyer. He is the proud father of five children, ranging in ages from 7 to 27, and he just welcomed his first grand child into the world in 2017. He loves golf, fishing and gardening but most of all, he enjoys spending time with his large family and 2 wonderful dogs.

image

Definition of Evidence

  • In legal terms, evidence covers the burden of proof, admissibility, relevance, weight and sufficiency of what should be admitted into the record of a legal proceeding. Evidence -- crucial in both civil and criminal proceedings -- may include blood or hair samples, video surveillance recordings, or witness testimony. The Federal Rules of Evidence(PD...
See more on findlaw.com

Terms to Know

Practice Area Notes

  • If you are a defendant in either a criminal or civil trial, your attorney may challenge and/or try to suppress evidencepresented by the other party. One of your attorney's most vital tasks is to find evidence that best supports your case. The main difference between the use of evidence in criminal and civil cases is the burden of proof. For a guilty verdict in a criminal trial, the prosecuti…
See more on findlaw.com

Related Practice Areas

Rules of Evidence Basics

Types of Evidence

  • There are four general types of evidence: 1. Real (or tangible) evidence is directly involved in the case, such as the gun involved in the murder. 2. Demonstrative evidence helps to clarify or assist in witness testimony. A map showing the scene of the accident is an example of this. 3. Documentary evidence can also be a type of real evidence, such as a contract. This includes ele…
See more on practice.findlaw.com

Relevant Evidence

  • For evidence to be relevant, there must be some logical connection, even if just a tenuous one, to the evidence and the fact trying to be proved. An item of evidence can be admissible even if it does not prove or disprove something on its own. As the Federal Rules of Evidence puts it, evidence is relevant if: 1. “it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it woul…
See more on practice.findlaw.com

Authentication

  • In addition to being relevant, admissible evidence must be authenticated. To authenticate evidence is to show that the evidence is what it is supposed to be. Attorneys can authenticate evidence through: 1. Witness testimony 2. Stipulating the evidence is authentic with opposing counsel 3. A request for admission, usually issued during discovery, in...
See more on practice.findlaw.com

Lay Witness Testimony

  • Lay witness testimony involves an individual testifying in court about facts or opinions to which they have personal knowledge (FRE 701). The old prohibition on lay witnesses being able to only testify to “facts" proved untenable. Lay witness testimony is admissible if: 1. It's based on the witness' perception 2. It is not based on technical knowledge (i.e. it is not expert witness testimo…
See more on practice.findlaw.com

Expert Witness Testimony

  • Expert testimony is the opinion of an expert regarding a fact. Unlike lay witness testimony, an expert witness can testify regarding a fact to which they do not have first-hand knowledge. For example, a neurosurgeon can testify about the effect of brain damage on an accident victim even if they did not personally operate on the victim. Expert witness testimony is admissible if: 1. The …
See more on practice.findlaw.com

Character Evidence

  • Typically, evidence of someone's characteris not admissible to prove that a person acted in accordance with their character or trait. In other words, evidence that a person stole before is not admissible to prove that they stole this time. This is true whether a person's character is relevant or not. Just because Johnny stole M&Ms before doesn't mean he stole the Snickers Bar this tim…
See more on practice.findlaw.com

Best Evidence Rule

  • The best evidence rule (FRE 1002) requires that an original writing or record be used, unless there is a good reason for it. Legitimate reasons to not use an original copy include: 1. It is disputed what the original copy is 2. The circumstances would make it unfair 3. The original is not available
See more on practice.findlaw.com

Hearsay

  • Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. “Bob told me back in June that Johnny stole that candy bar" is hearsay, because it occurred out of court and is being offered to prove that Johnny stole a candy bar. Hearsay is generally not admissible, but there are numerous exceptions to this rule. There are also exceptio…
See more on practice.findlaw.com

Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product

  • Confidential communications made between an attorney and their client regarding legal advice is protected. This could include actual legal advice, requests for legal advice, and facts provided by the client to the attorney made for the purpose of obtaining legal advice. The Work Product doctrine protects tangible and documentary evidence made in preparation for litigation.
See more on practice.findlaw.com