According to Texas’s attorney, why should the flag be protected? to uphold it as a symbol of unity to prevent other symbols from being adopted to allow it to lose its symbolic effect to preserve it as a symbol of nationhood to protect its effect as a symbol
Full Answer
2 answers: a_sh-v [17] 11 months ago. 5 0. The flag has its symbolical meaning to every country. The burning of the flag by Johnson Texas is a sign of protest to the policies of President Ronal Reagan. This action is a symbolic speech that covers …
Sep 24, 2021 · According to Texas’s attorney, why should the flag be protected? to uphold it as a symbol of unity to prevent other symbols from being adopted to allow it to lose its symbolic effect to preserve it as a symbol of nationhood to protect its effect as a symbol
Jun 10, 2019 · According to texas’s attorney, why should the flag be protected? Answers Answer from: 1deanxcas1 SHOW ANSWER The flag has its symbolical meaning to every country. The burning of the flag by Johnson Texas is a sign of protest to …
We feel very certain that Congress has the power to both adopt a national symbol and to take steps to prevent the destruction of that symbol, to protect the symbol . . . we believe that if a symbol is . . . abused that it can in fact, lose its symbolic effect. According to Texas's attorney, why should the flag be protected?
The Court has recognized that the First Amendment protects certain forms of symbolic speech. Flag burning is such a form of symbolic speech. When a flag is privately owned, the owner should be able to burn it if the owner chooses, especially if this action is meant in the form of protest.
Which statement best describes the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v. Johnson? It prevented acts of symbolic protest against the federal government. It protected actions such as flag burning and not just spoken or written words.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision in favor of Johnson. The high court agreed that symbolic speech – no matter how offensive to some – is protected under the First Amendment.
In Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), the Supreme Court struck down on First Amendment grounds a Texas flag desecration law. The 5-4 decision has served as the center point of a continuing debate regarding the value of free speech as exercised through the burning of the U.S. flag as a form of political protest.
People might react violently to flag burning. However, according to the Court, prohibiting flag burning would not prevent "breaches of the peace" because Johnson's conduct did not threaten to disturb the peace. 3. According to the Court, Texas asserted an interest in preserving the flag as a symbol of national unity.Aug 24, 2020
(5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.
Did the Supreme Court in Texas v. Johnson find that flag burning constituted "speech?" yes, because this conduct was intended to convey a particular message.
Symbolic speech consists of nonverbal, nonwritten forms of communication, such as flag burning, wearing arm bands, and burning of draft cards. It is generally protected by the First Amendment unless it causes a specific, direct threat to another individual or public order.
in a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that Johnson's burning of a flag was protected expression under the First Amendment. The Court found that Johnson's actions fell into the category of expressive conduct and had a distinctively political nature.
Loving v. Virginia is considered one of the most significant legal decisions of the civil rights era. By declaring Virginia's anti-miscegenation law unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ended prohibitions on interracial marriage and dealt a major blow to segregation.Nov 17, 2017
At oral argument, the state defended its statute on two grounds: first, states had a compelling interest in preserving a venerated national symbol; second, the state had a compelling interest in preventing breaches of the peace.
Facts of the case Johnson was tried and convicted under a Texas law outlawing flag desecration. He was sentenced to one year in jail and assessed a $2,000 fine. After the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction, the case went to the Supreme Court.Mar 21, 1989
The flag has its symbolical meaning to every country. The burning of the flag by Johnson Texas is a sign of protest to the policies of President Ronal Reagan. This action is a symbolic speech that covers the free speech clause of the first amendment.
Who wanted to make drastic changes in society? a.radical b.patriot c.traitor d.independence e.loyalist