1Prosecutors are the most powerful officials in the American criminal justice system. … 2In this paper, I discuss the charging and plea-bargaining functions of the American prosecutor and how they operate to give prosecutors more control over the criminal justice system than any other criminal justice official.
Prosecutors are the most powerful officials in the American criminal justice system. The decisions they make, particularly the charging and plea-bargaining decisions, control the operation of the system and often predetermine the outcome of criminal cases.
T he prosecutor is the principal representative of the state in all matters related to the adjudication of criminal offenses. He has a hand in virtually every decision made in the legal course of every case that comes before the criminal courts. The prosecution function is organized differently at the local and federal levels.
Prosecuting attorney: An individual who is a legal representative of a particular state is solely responsible for bringing criminal charge to the court. They are also termed as county attorney, commonwealth attorney, state’s attorney, or district attorney. Chapter 7, Problem 5QR is solved. View this answer.
Prosecutors are the gatekeepers of the criminal legal system. They decide whether to prosecute and what to charge. Their harsh and discriminatory practices have fueled a vast expansion of incarceration as the answer to societal ills over the last several decades.
Prosecutors hold all the power in plea bargaining because strict sentencing laws with mandatory minimums have stripped judges of nearly all decision-making power. It's no wonder that 95% of all convictions are the result of pleas.
Prosecutors shall perform an active role in criminal proceedings, including institution of prosecution and, where authorized by law or consistent with local practice, in the investigation of crime, supervision over the legality of these investigations, supervision of the execution of court decisions and the exercise of ...
They control the direction and outcome of all criminal cases, particularly through their charging and plea-bargaining decisions. These decisions have greater impact and more serious consequences than those of any other criminal justice official.
The prosecutors position is so powerful because the exercise of discretion rests with this office. The prosecutor has the discretion to charge the case (or not), to decide what the charge will be, or to dismiss it. The prosecutor has the most influence in plea bargaining.
Autonomy and secrecy, complex criminal code and mandatory minimums—in combination, these factors have given prosecutors enormous leverage, and the opportunity to wield it relentlessly and selectively.
In criminal cases, prosecutors are responsible for representing not only the interests of society at large, but also those of victims of crimes. They also have duties to other individuals, including persons suspected of a crime and witnesses.
Sensitivity, a good memory, and close attention to detail are also marks of good prosecutors. Above all, a reputation for fundamental fairness and honesty as well as credibility and trustworthiness must be nurtured. Prosecutors must be comfortable with the myriad of imperfections in the criminal justice system.
Journalist Emily Bazelon says most prosecutors, not judges, are the most powerful people in a courtroom. “The person who gets to decide what the charges are in a criminal case—that person is the prosecutor,” she said. ...Sep 21, 2019
The decision to prosecute is based on the following factors: The sufficiency of the evidence linking the suspect to the offense. The seriousness of the offense. The size of the court's caseload.
Alan Morton Dershowitz is an American attorney, political commentator, and jurist. He has spent the past fifty years practicing the law and is well recognized for handling a number of high-profile legal cases.
A prosecutor may choose not to pursue a criminal case for several reasons. Political pressure. ... Because the role of top prosecutor is an elected position in many jurisdictions, prosecutors may face political pressure to prosecute or refrain from prosecuting a person suspected of committing a crime. Limited resources.
20 Because prosecutors play such a dominant and controlling role in the criminal process through the exercise of broad, unchecked discretion, their role in the complexities of racial disparity in the criminal justice system is inextricable and profound.
Prosecutorial power is vast and unrestrained , and the mechanisms that purport to hold prosecutors accountable are weak and often totally ineffective. In addition, the most important prosecutorial decisions are made behind closed doors – away from public scrutiny and thus immune from public accountability. The most remarkable feature of these important, sometimes life-and-death decisions is that they are totally discretionary. The deficiency of prosecutorial discretion lies not in its existence, but in the randomness and arbitrariness of its application. Even in prosecution offices that promulgate general policies for the prosecution of criminal cases, there is no effective mechanism for enforcement or public accountability. Self-regulation by prosecution offices is largely nonexistent or ineffective, and the United States Supreme Court has protected prosecutors from both public and judicial scrutiny. In this article, Professor Davis focuses on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion in charging and plea bargaining. She demonstrates how prosecutors bear the brunt of the responsibility for the race and class disparities in the American criminal justice system. She also discusses why the current mechanisms of accountability for prosecutors in the American democratic system are ineffective. Finally, she suggests measures for reform.
Most state and local prosecutors are elected officials who run for office and serve for a set term of years 27. The electorate has the power to vote the prosecutor out of office. However, the state and local electoral process suffers from some of the same limitations as the federal system.
The deficiency of prosecutorial discretion lies not in its existence, but in the randomness and arbitrariness of its application. Even in prosecution offices that promulgate general policies for the prosecution of criminal cases, there is no effective mechanism for enforcement or public accountability.
Although most American prosecutors are elected officials, the democratic process does not effectively serve as a check on prosecutorial power because the charging and plea-bargaining decisions are made behind closed doors, shielded from public view. 2 In this paper, I discuss the charging and plea-bargaining functions of ...
1 Prosecutors are the most powerful officials in the American criminal justice system. They control the direction and outcome of all criminal cases, particularly through their charging and plea-bargaining decisions. These decisions have greater impact and more serious consequences than those of any other criminal justice official.
The charging decision is critical, because it determines whether a person will face criminal charges and ultimately risk the loss of liberty. The prosecutor is in control at this stage, even in jurisdictions where grand juries investigate and bring charges through the indictment process 1.
Because most chief prosecutors are elected, the political climate in a community plays a large role in their day-to-day activities, and virtually always demands attention to the most serious, generally violent, crimes.
Most chief prosecutors have complete authority and control over the prosecution policies and practices in their jurisdictions, constrained only by the broad outlines of criminal justice statutes, case law, and court procedures that are under the authority of the judiciary (McCoy, 1998).
prosecutors traditionally have been divided among several functions within the justice system. For example, most civil law jurisdictions require prosecution if the evidence is sufficient, and require that a judge approve a decision to charge an individual with a crime. Until recently, it was the police who decided what cases to bring in England. In the United States, the decision to either charge or dismiss the case by declining to bring formal charges is within the prosecutor's power and discretion.
The grand jury is a particularly powerful tool at the disposal of prosecutors in about half of U.S. jurisdictions. A grand jury consists of a group of citizens that hears complaints and accusations brought by the prosecutor in criminal cases.
He may provide advisory assistance to the police in an investigation to make sure that the evidence required for con viction is present and that investigators have access to certain tools that the prosecutor controls, such as the grand jury or requests to the court for warrants for searches or electronic surveillance.
Prosecutors, however, have a responsibility to think beyond the big case. Several workshop participants asserted that chief prosecutors must be able to elevate their focus to all of the matters under their control that have large consequences for the community and the broader society.